Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB30F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very similar but the GR II (APS-C) and WB30F (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The GR II was unveiled 2 years later than the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR II scores against the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB30F
GR II | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 30 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GR II
WB30F | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB30F
GR II | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II provides outside measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GR II versus the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3515f/3515f899755dd5a8ebdebd33e3747a1e35e041fa" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and WB30F is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ed2/a2ed2996064c84795ed2f73daff53cd8658b3831" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WB30F.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor measurements. The GR II comes with the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher GR II should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abcb0/abcb014bc6d1fa33f21bf4dd93500a03345ecdc5" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/297cb/297cb85f7e715f1c30c989ce83a32e8cc9a40e21" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $180 |