Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
  • Later Model is Sony a5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (APS-C).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR II was manufactured 2 years later than the NEX-3N and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GR II grades against the NEX-3N with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony NEX-3N

 GR II NEX-3N 
RevealedJune 2015February 2013Fresher by 29 months
Screen resolution1230k460kClearer screen (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh GR II

 NEX-3N GR II 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony NEX-3N

 GR II NEX-3N 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II offers external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GR II against the NEX-3N.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and NEX-3N is 89 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and NEX-3N.

Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent GR II should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II Portrait photography details
Sony NEX-3N Portrait photography details
75
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
66
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR II
Street photography with Sony NEX-3N
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (251 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
77
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Sports photography camera
50
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
53
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good battery life (480 shots)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
Travel photography with Sony NEX-3N
67
lighter than competition (251g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
good battery life (480 per charge)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography factors
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
70
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (480 CIPA)
no image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Vlogging camera
32
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (251 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone jack
28
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
no microphone support
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony NEX-3N
 Ricoh GR IISony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR II Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Category Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-06-17 2013-02-25
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor GR Engine V Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Available lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251 grams (0.55 pounds) 269 grams (0.59 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 74
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 12.5
DXO Low light score 1078 1067
Other
Battery life 320 images 480 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB-65 NPFW50
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $599 $399