Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR II was announced 2 years after the NEX-F3 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GR II grades versus the NEX-F3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony NEX-F3
GR II | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | August 2012 | More modern by 35 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh GR II
NEX-F3 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony NEX-F3
GR II | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II has got external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the GR II vs the NEX-F3.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and NEX-F3 is 89 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and NEX-F3.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos but you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher GR II will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 314g (0.69 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 470 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $470 |