Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Introduced August 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR II was announced 2 years after the NEX-F3 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GR II grades versus the NEX-F3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony NEX-F3

 GR II NEX-F3 
IntroducedJune 2015August 2012More modern by 35 months
Display resolution1230k920kCrisper display (+310k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh GR II

 NEX-F3 GR II 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony NEX-F3

 GR II NEX-F3 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II has got external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the GR II vs the NEX-F3.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and NEX-F3 is 89 and 86 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and NEX-F3.

To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos but you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher GR II will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-F3
75
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW files
74
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR II Street photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Street photography advice
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (251 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
76
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II Sports photography info
Sony NEX-F3 Sports photography info
50
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
53
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great battery (470 CIPA)
max frames per second very slow (6.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
Travel photography with Sony NEX-F3
67
lighter than competition (251 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
great battery (470 shots)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography advice
59
has manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
70
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (470 shots)
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging information
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging information
32
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (251 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone jack
27
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
doesn't have mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR II vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony NEX-F3
 Ricoh GR IISony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR II Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Category Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2015-06-17 2012-08-16
Body design Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR Engine V Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251g (0.55 lb) 314g (0.69 lb)
Dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 73
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 12.3
DXO Low light score 1078 1114
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 470 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB-65 NPFW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $599 $470