Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR III and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WG-50 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR III was launched 17 months later than the WG-50 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the GR III matches up versus the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh WG-50
GR III | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | May 2017 | More recent by 17 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Ricoh GR III
WG-50 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Ricoh WG-50
GR III | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III enjoys outer dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III and Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III versus the WG-50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and WG-50.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR III will give greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern GR III is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $900 | $280 |