Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST93, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and ST93 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR III was announced 7 years after the ST93 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR III grades versus the ST93 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR III & Samsung ST93. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung ST93
GR III | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | April 2011 | More modern by 91 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GR III
ST93 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST93
GR III | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III has outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the GR III against the ST93.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and ST93 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and ST93.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR III will produce extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern GR III will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST93 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 110 grams (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $900 | - |