Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Old Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-450 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-450 was released 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-450 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-450 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-450
XZ-2 iHS | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 45 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-450 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-450 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-450 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-450 and the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee93/1ee9393044494ff80f57aabdf86dfef5787ecd97" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbe83/dbe83018c9edc82a5c196c7688690745f14df5b5" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-450 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f8c4/5f8c4a3a107f03eb31816d53122b354673c61284" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec2bc/ec2bc1f56ef4ff829f1ef47e36157158a2992ded" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-03-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 512 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 340 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $138 | $450 |