Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Let's look closer at the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB700 (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR III was unveiled 7 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GR III grades vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB700
GR III | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | December 2010 | Fresher by 95 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Crisper display (+423k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GR III
WB700 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB700
GR III | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III and the WB700.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB700.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will resolve extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern GR III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB700 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $900 | $300 |