Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Updated by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and HZ35W (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was revealed 2 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GR grades versus the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung HZ35W
GR | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 35 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 614k | Sharper screen (+616k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GR
HZ35W | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ35W
GR | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR features physical measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the GR and the HZ35W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and HZ35W.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR will produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer GR should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-04-17 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $971 | $300 |