Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Updated by Ricoh GR II
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Also referred to as WB650
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and HZ35W (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR was revealed 2 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GR grades versus the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung HZ35W

 GR HZ35W 
LaunchedApril 2013June 2010More modern by 35 months
Screen resolution1230k614kSharper screen (+616k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GR

 HZ35W GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ35W

 GR HZ35W 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR features physical measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the GR and the HZ35W.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and HZ35W.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR will produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer GR should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography factors
74
manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
34
has manual focus
includes face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography features
Samsung HZ35W Street photography features
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (245 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Sports photography camera
45
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than average (245g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
63
lighter than competition (245 grams)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography highlights
61
manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
43
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (245 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of external microphone jack
31
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh GRSamsung HZ35W
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-04-17 2010-06-16
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $971 $300