Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL102, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR was revealed 4 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GR scores versus the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung SL102
GR | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR
SL102 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL102
GR | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR provides exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the GR and the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and SL102.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern GR will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $971 | $130 |