Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Released April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Additionally referred to as ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL102, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR was revealed 4 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GR scores versus the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung SL102

 GR SL102 
ReleasedApril 2013January 2009More modern by 52 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR

 SL102 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL102

 GR SL102 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR provides exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the GR and the SL102.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and SL102.

As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern GR will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography features
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography features
74
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
25
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (245 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
55
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography info
Samsung SL102 Sports photography info
45
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than competition (245 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
62
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography advice
62
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
27
great max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL102 Vlogging highlights
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (245g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
missing microphone socket
30
great max aperture (f)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GRSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung SL102
Also Known as - ES55
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-04-17 2009-01-08
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 -
Macro focus range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings - Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/4000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 grams (0.54 lbs) 116 grams (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $971 $130