Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Renewed by Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR and Sony HX200V, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very well matched but the GR (APS-C) and HX200V (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The GR was revealed 12 months later than the HX200V and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR scores against the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony HX200V
GR | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh GR
HX200V | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony HX200V
GR | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR provides outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR and Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the GR against the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6046c/6046c384ee32e76c358e1761c4780a49a6cfafb8" alt="Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V size comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and HX200V is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ca2/e0ca2613a0a1527cc47e12f88b4744e03a796514" alt="Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and HX200V.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX200V will give you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern GR provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3ede/a3edef789eb6b333b7c9d666542f8e9bfc234068" alt="Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e5f/06e5f0925fcb2cf7c089f126be62211ffeaa7678" alt="Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 12.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 450 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $971 | $480 |