Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung MV800, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and MV800 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 22 months prior to the MV800 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up versus the MV800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung MV800
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
MV800 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | November 2009 | More modern by 22 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung MV800
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys outside dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the MV800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and MV800 is 77 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and MV800.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung MV800 will render more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Micro SD |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $566 | $499 |