Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST600: A Hands-On Comparison for Photo Enthusiasts

When you peel back the fog of marketing hype and numbers, two cameras as distinct as the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and the Samsung ST600 reveal themselves as representatives of entirely different photographic philosophies - one a focused, modular mirrorless with a macro specialty, the other a versatile ultra-compact designed for casual grab-and-go shooting. Over years of testing hundreds of cameras, I’ve rarely encountered a pairing so illustrative of contrasting value statements: precision craftsmanship versus pocket-friendly flexibility.

This in-depth comparison will dissect the Ricoh and Samsung side-by-side, spanning their technology, real-world performance across photographic disciplines, and usability. By the end, you’ll have a firm grasp of which camera suits what kind of photographer - whether you crave absolute image quality and macro detail or prefer a nimble, ready-everywhere companion.

Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: The First Impression

Handling experience makes or breaks a camera - no matter how shiny the specs. Let’s start with the physical dimensions, weight, and grip.

Measuring 114x70x77 mm and weighing 453 grams, the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm Macro firmly claims its place in the "advanced mirrorless" category with a chunkier, rangefinder-style body that feels substantial in hand and encourages deliberate shooting. The body’s solid build (though not weather sealed) inspires confidence - it doesn’t rattle or flex under light pressure. The fixed 50mm lens and manual focus knob evoke vintage rangefinder charm, inviting precision work more than rapid-fire shooting.

By contrast, the Samsung ST600 is a classic ultra-compact marvel: tiny at 104x60x20 mm, featherweight at 150 grams, and extremely pocketable. It feels almost toy-like next to the Ricoh, but that’s the point. It’s designed to disappear into your palm or purse. The slimness is impressive; however, its lack of a dedicated grip can inhibit stability, especially when zoomed all the way in at 135mm equivalent focal length. The use of plastics helps keep the weight down but sacrifices a bit of ruggedness.

From an ergonomic standpoint, the Ricoh’s heft and layout target photographers who want to craft the image carefully - macro shots, portraits, or landscapes with calm precision. The Samsung is clearly for casual, everyday shooting where lightness and simplicity are paramount.

Control and Interface: Navigating the Cameras' Souls

Beyond size, control layout and user interface define how swiftly and efficiently the photographer can operate the camera. This becomes paramount when shooting in variable or fast-paced conditions.

The Ricoh GXR A12 sports classic physical dials and buttons - aperture priority, shutter priority, manual exposure modes, and exposure compensation - all accessible without diving into menus. The 3-inch fixed screen is modestly resolved at 920k dots and flanked by well-positioned buttons. There’s no touchscreen or live view autofocus touch, which feels dated but doesn’t detract from the shooting aesthetic. The absence of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) in the base package nudges you to shoot from the rear screen or pair with an optional EVF - a downside if you prefer eye-level composing, especially outdoors in bright light.

Across on the Samsung ST600, the 3.5-inch screen is larger and brighter at 1152k resolution - plus it’s a responsive touchscreen. This lends itself well to quick AF point selection, menu navigation, and reviewing images in the field. Unlike the Ricoh, there’s no optical or electronic viewfinder, which is common in ultra-compacts of this era. The control scheme is minimal, leaning heavily on the touchscreen interface. While you gain ease of access, you lose direct tactile feedback, which some shooters find frustrating.

If you want precise manual control without screen dependency, Ricoh is the winner here. If you prefer swiping and tapping for quick shots and playback, Samsung will please.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Core of Every Camera

The battle here pits a large APS-C sensor against a significantly smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor. This dichotomy profoundly influences image quality, dynamic range, tonal rendition, and high-ISO performance.

The Ricoh’s APS-C CMOS sensor measures 23.6x15.7 mm, boasting 12 megapixels - a resolution sufficient for large prints and cropping flexibility. The CMOS tech alongside Ricoh’s GR engine III processor enables respectable noise control up to ISO 3200 (native), with clean midtone gradations and generally neutral color reproduction. The sensor surface area of 370.52 mm² admits more light than the Samsung’s tiny 27.72 mm² CCD sensor.

The Samsung ST600 uses a tiny 6.08x4.56 mm CCD sensor with 14 megapixels packed into just 27.72 mm². This higher pixel density on a small sensor leads to reduced dynamic range and higher noise levels at elevated ISOs. It supports ISO as low as 80 and up to 4800 native (6400 boosted), but the real-world noise beyond ISO 800 or 1600 is rapidly impractical. Still, under good lighting, the Samsung delivers decent images for social sharing and casual prints.

When shooting landscapes, portraits requiring smooth skin tones, or night scenes demanding dynamic range, Ricoh’s APS-C sensor shines. Samsung’s sensor limitations hamper image quality but are offset by the camera’s convenience and zoom versatility.

Lens and Optics: Sharpness, Range, and Specialties

With the Ricoh, the lens is fixed - a 50mm equivalent f/2.5 macro prime with a minimum focusing distance of 1 cm, offering a true 1:1 life-size magnification. The Samsung ST600 equips a 27-135mm equivalent zoom lens with f/3.3-5.5 aperture range and a 5 cm macro minimum focus distance.

The Ricoh’s prime quality lens is unsurpassed for macro enthusiasts and portrait photographers who prize shallow depth of field and stunning bokeh. Its fast aperture captures crisp detail, enabling isolation of subjects on textured backgrounds. The lens’s fixed nature guards against optical compromises often found in zooms, elevating image sharpness and contrast.

Conversely, the Samsung’s zoom brings huge framing versatility from wide-angle landscapes to telephoto snapshots of wildlife or people from a distance. Its optical image stabilization offsets handshake, crucial given the slower aperture and small sensor. Yet, the lens’s relatively narrow aperture limits low-light performance and depth of field control.

For meticulously detailed macro work, the GXR A12 is a marvel; for all-in-one travel convenience and snapshooting, the ST600’s zoom range excels.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability

A camera’s AF system is a vital aspect determining success in dynamic photography genres - wildlife, sports, and street.

The Ricoh GXR adopts a contrast-detection AF system with multi-area and selective point options. It supports AF single, AF continuous, and manual focus modes but lacks face or eye detection. AF speed is modest by today’s mirrorless standards, and there’s no AF tracking, making fast moving subjects challenging. Its continuous shooting rate caps at 3 fps, sufficient for deliberate shooting but insufficient for sports or wildlife bursts.

The Samsung ST600 includes contrast-detection AF with center-weighted and multi-area capabilities, alongside face detection (though somewhat basic) and touch-to-focus on the screen. AF is optimized for still subjects; continuous shooting is not specified and realistically limited by processing speed.

When capturing fast action, neither camera excels; their autofocus implementations favor controlled, static composition. Wildlife and sports photographers should look elsewhere. However, the Ricoh’s manual focus precision benefits macro and portrait photographers eager for perfect control.

LCD and Viewfinder Experience: Composing and Reviewing Shots

You’ll spend long hours composing and reviewing images through the LCD or viewfinder - image fidelity and visibility are critical.

The Ricoh’s 3-inch 920k display is sharp and color-accurate though modest in size. The lack of touchscreen means menu navigation is button-reliant but intentional. The optional EVF (sold separately) is a notable expense and bulk addition, but necessary for shooting in bright light or with eye-level composition habits.

Samsung’s ST600 impresses with a 3.5-inch 1152k touchscreen - bright, sharp, and responsive. This makes quick framing, especially selfies or street photos, effortless. The inability to fit an EVF is standard for a camera this size. The touchscreen UI is intuitive but not as precise as dedicated buttons for exposure tweaks.

If a large, responsive LCD is priority - Samsung takes the crown. For photographers focused on sharpness and detail accuracy, Ricoh’s display offers trustworthy representation.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability on the Road

Neither camera offers weather sealing or robust environmental protection - understandable given their target users and era.

Ricoh’s metal chassis feels sturdier and more durable than Samsung’s plastic-heavy build. The GXR’s design suggests a camera that can survive gentle outdoor use, but it remains vulnerable to dust and moisture. Samsung ST600’s construction aligns with ultra-compact expectations: lightweight, slim, and more delicate.

Landscape and travel photographers seeking ruggedness should invest in protective cases when using either model.

Video Capabilities: More Than Just Stills?

Both cameras provide basic video recording - important for hybrid shooters.

The Ricoh records HD video at 1280x720 at 24 fps in Motion JPEG format. While functional, video options lack manual focus during recording, stereo input, or advanced stabilization. Limited continuous shooting speed and absence of audio ports restrict creative control.

Samsung ST600 supports similar HD resolution at 30 or 15 fps also in Motion JPEG, with additional slower frame rate options. There is built-in optical stabilization that aids smoother handheld video - a distinct practical benefit given its form factor.

Neither camera competes with modern hybrid video performers - but Samsung is marginally better suited for casual video due to its touchscreen and stabilization.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much?

Ricoh GXR A12’s battery life claims around 320 shots per charge, respectable for a mirrorless of this generation but falling short on long outings. The battery format is proprietary and replacement cost is moderate.

Samsung ST600 lacks officially published battery life numbers, but real-world use suggests around 200-250 shots per charge, given smaller battery size and touchscreen power draw. It uses SLB07 batteries, a common energy source for Samsung compacts.

Both cameras feature single card slots - Ricoh uses SD/SDHC, while Samsung relies on MicroSD/MicroSDHC cards. The larger SD cards can be more versatile and faster, favoring Ricoh.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

A tool’s value is best judged in context. How do these cameras perform across shooting scenarios?

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro screen back Samsung ST600 screen back

Portrait Photography

• Ricoh GXR A12: Exceptional for portraits thanks to the f/2.5 prime lens delivering shallow depth of field and pleasant bokeh. Skin tones are rendered smoothly with low noise even at moderate ISO, though lack of face detection AF means you must focus manually.
• Samsung ST600: Versatile zoom is convenient but limited by small sensor and slower apertures. Portraits can appear flat in low light with noisier shadows. Touch AF simplifies composing but image quality is average.

Landscape Photography

• Ricoh: The APS-C sensor’s dynamic range excels in retaining shadow detail and avoiding blown highlights. Resolution is ample for large prints. However, fixed 50mm focal length restricts framing - you must “zoom with your feet.”
• Samsung: Wide zoom range is a plus for framing varied perspectives. Small sensor limits dynamic range and detail in shadows, but bright days yield pleasant images. Ultra-compact size makes it travel-friendly for hikes.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

• Both cameras are constrained by modest continuous shooting rates and weak autofocus tracking. Neither is recommended for fast action or wildlife sequences.

Street Photography

• Samsung wins for discreetness and portability - just slide it from your pocket, frame, and shoot. Touchscreen AF accelerates responsiveness.
• Ricoh feels more deliberate, less inconspicuous, and slower to operate, but rewards the patient street shooter with higher quality output.

Macro Photography

• The Ricoh GXR A12’s 1:1 magnification at 1 cm focus distance outshines the Samsung’s 5 cm minimum macro. Combined with sharp optics and manual focus, the Ricoh is a superb macro tool.
• Samsung’s macro mode is suitable only for casual close-ups without fine detail.

Night and Astrophotography

• The Ricoh’s larger sensor controls noise better at moderate ISOs and supports longer exposures. Manual exposure modes further aid low-light creativity.
• Samsung’s small sensor introduces significant noise past ISO 400-800, limiting usefulness after dark.

Video and Travel Photography

• Samsung’s compact size, touchscreen interface, and optical stabilization make it friendlier for casual travel videos.
• Ricoh’s rigid macro focus lens and heavier body limit versatility but yield higher quality stills.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

The Ricoh GXR platform is unique - the sensor and lens are modular units, but here the lens is fixed to the A12 unit. While this offers excellent optical design per module, your choice is limited to what Ricoh released, focusing on primes and macros. This restricts users wanting zoom flexibility without carrying multiple modules.

Samsung ST600’s fixed zoom lens cannot be swapped or upgraded but delivers decent all-around coverage in one compact package.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC connectivity - common omissions in devices launched in 2009-2010. Both include USB 2.0 and HDMI output for image transfer and external display.

If you require wireless transfer or smartphone integration, these cameras fall short.

Price-to-Performance: Evaluating Value

At prices around $566 for the Ricoh and $330 for the Samsung, your budget leans strongly toward the Samsung for affordability and versatility. However, the Ricoh offers higher build quality, better sensors, optics, and image fidelity at a premium.

The Ricoh GXR A12 represents a specialized tool for photographers prioritizing macro and image quality over casual convenience. Samsung ST600 is oriented to users wanting a flexible, compact daily shooter at a consumer price.

Summary of Overall and Genre-Specific Scores

Our evaluation confirms:

• Ricoh GXR A12 scores highest in image quality, macro photography, and controlled shooting disciplines requiring manual precision.
• Samsung ST600 shines for street, travel, and casual photography where ease, zoom versatility, and pocketability rule.

Recommendations: Which Camera for Whom?

If you’re a serious macro photographer, portrait artist, or landscape enthusiast seeking excellent image quality and don’t mind the modest size and manual focus, the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is a captivating option that rewards close-up craft and deliberate shooting.

If your priorities lean toward travel, quick candids, street photography, and general snapshots with a budget-conscious eye, the Samsung ST600 delivers a lightweight, easy-to-use camera with good zoom versatility and a user-friendly touchscreen - ideal for beginners and casual users.

Neither camera suits fast sports or wildlife photography due to slow burst rates and limited AF tracking.

Final Thoughts: Experience Speaks Volumes

Having spent countless hours behind the viewfinder of a broad spectrum of cameras, I value tools that empower the photographer. The Ricoh GXR A12 gives no shortcuts - its manual focus lens and clear exposure modes demand engagement but yield sharp, characterful images with rich detail and creamy bokeh unmatched by compacts in this price bracket.

Samsung’s ST600 meanwhile slips effortlessly into your day, ready to catch moments without fuss. Its small sensor and zoom lens make concessions in quality but add a layer of fun and spontaneity that some photographers prize above all.

Ultimately, dissecting these two reveals the vibrant diversity in photographic gear - from purposeful specialists like the Ricoh to versatile everyday compacts like the Samsung. Your choice hinges on which photographic adventure you plan to undertake.

With this detailed, hands-on comparison, I trust you now have the clarity introduced by experience, expertise, and an honest appraisal. Hope this helps guide your next camera purchase!

Happy shooting!

End of Article