Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB800F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 4 years earlier than the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB800F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB800F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | November 2009 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB800F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB800F is 77 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB800F.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will provide extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $566 | $300 |