Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
89 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed May 2014
- Older Model is Sony RX100 II
- Successor is Sony RX100 IV
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and RX100 III (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and RX100 III (1") come with different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-2 iHS was launched 10 months earlier than the RX100 III and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the RX100 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony RX100 III
TG-2 iHS | RX100 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
RX100 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2014 | June 2013 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 610k | Crisper display (+619k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony RX100 III
TG-2 iHS | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers outside dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 III has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the RX100 III.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and RX100 III is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and RX100 III.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 III will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-2 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2014-05-15 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 290 gr (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $380 | $748 |