Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony A200, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 17 months after the A200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up against the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony A200
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2009 | July 2008 | More modern by 17 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
A200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony A200
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and the A200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A200 is 77 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A200.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2009-11-10 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $566 | $100 |