Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43


91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Introduced July 2011

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony HX9V, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and HX9V (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 20 months earlier than the HX9V which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX9V being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the HX9V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony HX9V
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | HX9V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
HX9V | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony HX9V
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony HX9V has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony HX9V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the HX9V.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and HX9V is 77 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and HX9V.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony HX9V will give extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $566 | $328 |