Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
57
Overall
59

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Revealed February 2012
  • Superseded the Samsung NX100
  • Replacement is Samsung NX210
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX200, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was released within a month of the NX200 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores against the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung NX200

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 NX200 
Display resolution920k614kClearer display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 NX200 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX200

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 NX200 
RevealedFebruary 2012February 2012Similar generation
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the NX200.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX200 is 69 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX200.

As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung NX200 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography details
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography details
74
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
76
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Street photography highlights
55
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
more heavy than average (550g)
73
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (223g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography information
Samsung NX200 Sports photography information
48
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
55
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Travel photography highlights
59
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
more heavy than average (550 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
68
lighter than others (223 grams)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography features
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography features
63
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
70
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging details
Samsung NX200 Vlogging details
24
decently wide (24mm)
offers face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than average (550 grams)
34
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (223 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX200
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung NX200
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung NX200
Class Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-02-02 2012-02-28
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 15
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Available lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 550 gr (1.21 lbs) 223 gr (0.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 618
Other
Battery life 400 photos 330 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-90 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $871 $818