Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX200, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was released within a month of the NX200 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores against the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX200. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung NX200
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
NX200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX200
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the NX200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX200 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX200.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung NX200 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-02 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) | 223 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-90 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $871 | $818 |