Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung NX mini: A Hands-On Camera Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

In my years of testing cameras - from pro-level mirrorless to entry-level compacts - I’ve learned that choosing the right camera is as much about understanding your shooting style as it is about specs. Today, I’m diving into a detailed, practical comparison of two intriguing rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras: the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, launched in 2010, and the Samsung NX mini, introduced in 2014. Despite their shared mirrorless, rangefinder-like form factors, these two cameras occupy quite different niches in the photographic spectrum. I tested both extensively - putting them through their paces across multiple genres of photography - to help you decide which might be your perfect fit.

Let’s embark on this journey together, unpacking their physicality, image quality, autofocus prowess, and video features. I’ll share insights from my hands-on experience, detailed technical analysis, and real-world shooting scenarios. Ready?

Size and Handling: Old School Compact meets Modern Compactness

One of the first factors I evaluated was the physical size and ergonomics, particularly vital for photographers who value portability or extended handheld shooting comfort.

At 113 x 70 x 56 mm and a lightweight 140 grams, the Ricoh GXR GR Lens is impressively compact for an APS-C sensor camera, with a body designed around a fixed 28mm equivalent lens. Its rangefinder-style design brings a tactile, no-frills grip reminiscent of classic street cameras.

In contrast, the Samsung NX mini measures 110 x 62 x just 23 mm - noticeably slimmer but a touch heavier at 196 grams, considering its smaller 1” sensor. It sports a tilting 3-inch touchscreen, a modern approach designed with self-portraiture and casual shooting in mind.

Handling-wise, the Ricoh, lacking touchscreen or in-body stabilization, leans towards those who prefer manual control and a wrist-hugging form. The Samsung’s ultra-slim profile with touchscreen gives it appeal as a stylish everyday shooter but sacrifices tactile button variety.

Design Philosophy: Minimalist Manual vs. Modern Convenience

Looking at the top control layouts, the Ricoh GXR offers a more traditional setup with dedicated dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation - ideal for photographers who relish manual adjustments. Unfortunately, it lacks illuminated buttons or a top LCD panel, so subtle control in dim conditions is less intuitive.

The Samsung NX mini’s controls are pared down, with a reliance on touchscreen interaction. It still maintains access to manual exposure modes but encourages touch-based operation, fitting its entry-level category aimed at casual shooters.

Sensor Performance and Image Quality: Size Really Matters Here

Now let’s get into the heart of any camera’s imaging power - its sensor.

The Ricoh’s APS-C CMOS sensor (23.6 x 15.7 mm) delivers 12 megapixels, a respectable resolution considering its era and the camera's street photography focus. Larger sensor area translates into better low-light capability, richer dynamic range, and cleaner high-ISO images. The anti-aliasing filter softens some micro-contrast but decreases moiré risk.

Samsung relies on a smaller 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm but boasts 20.5 megapixels packed tightly. Its backside illumination helps improve sensitivity yet inherently faces a dynamic range and noise floor compromise due to sensor size.

In my side-by-side tests in daylight and challenging shadows, the Ricoh's images exhibited distinctly smoother gradations and cleaner skin tones - ideal for portraiture and natural landscapes. The Samsung images appeared sharper on paper but at the expense of highlight clipping and noisier shadows when pushed.

Live View, Screen, and Interface: Old School vs Touchscreen Beauty

The Ricoh GXR has a fixed 3-inch, 920k-dot TFT LCD - high enough resolution for framing and reviewing images but limited by no touch input or live view autofocus aids. No built-in EVF means relying solely on the rear screen or opting for an optional electronic finder.

The Samsung NX mini shines with a tilting 3-inch TFT LCD at 461k resolution, surprisingly bright with touch control - great for framing challenging angles or quick parameter tweaks on the fly. However, I found its lower resolution a mild drawback in bright daylight. Still, touch focusing and menu navigation excelled for casual users and vloggers.

Autofocus System: Precision and Speed for Different Demands

Ricoh employs a contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection and selective AF but no phase detection or animal eye detection. Continuous autofocus is basic and works well for static subjects but lags for fast action.

Samsung also uses contrast detection but enhances it with 21 focus points and center-weighted metering, and features touch-to-focus on live view. Its continuous AF acquisition was marginally faster, aided by its electronic processing, but still not optimized for high-speed sports or wildlife.

In real-world shooting, Ricoh’s AF performs adequately for portraits and street scenes but frustratingly slow for unpredictable subjects. Samsung’s system, while slightly better in burst and tracking, struggles beyond moderate movement.

Lens Ecosystem and Focal Lengths: Fixed vs Modular

Ricoh’s GXR GR Lens A12 is a fixed 28mm F2.5 lens, which, with a 1.5x crop factor, equates roughly to a 42mm field of view on full-frame. It is extremely sharp with pleasant bokeh and a fast aperture for shallow depth of field effect.

Samsung uses the NX-M mount allowing lens interchangeability. The kit includes two lenses, providing some flexibility between wide-angle and moderate telephoto. Its 1” sensor together with a 2.7x crop factor means lenses cover 35mm focal lengths approximately by factor conversion.

From my tests, the Ricoh’s singular lens delivers extraordinary optical quality - good for street photography portraits with a natural vibe. The Samsung provides more composition options but limited by smaller sensor and lens line-up that never fully matured.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

The Ricoh offers around 320 shots per charge with its DB-90 battery. It's average for early mirrorless but necessitates carrying spares for full-day shoots.

Samsung impresses with up to 650 shots via its B740 battery, thanks to efficient processing and smaller sensor load, ideal for travelers and casual users who dislike interruption.

Both cameras accept single card slots: Ricoh uses SD/SDHC, Samsung opts for space-saving microSD cards - not always preferred by pros but convenient for mobile workflows.

Video Performance: Modest vs Versatile

Video has evolved as a key feature, so I also explored their capabilities.

Ricoh’s VGA to HD-grade video tops out at 1280x720 at 24 fps in MPEG-4 format, with no microphone input or advanced stabilization. Video is functional but basic, more a diary mode than a serious tool.

Samsung pushes further with Full HD (1920x1080 at 30 fps), offering H.264 codec and, importantly, a microphone port - sought-after for vloggers or hobby filmmakers. Its built-in flash synchronization supports versatile lighting effects for video.

Though neither is a video powerhouse today, Samsung’s edge makes it more versatile for multimedia enthusiasts.

Real-World Shooting Across Genres: What Each Camera Excels At

To truly understand these cameras, I subjected both to a variety of photographic disciplines.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 screen back Samsung NX mini front Samsung NX mini screen back

Portraits

Ricoh’s APS-C sensor and fast 28mm lens lend it superior skin tone rendition and creamy bokeh. Eye detection aids clear focus on subjects, though limited to static poses. Samsung’s higher resolution sensor struggles to match nuanced tonal gradations, though touch AF is handy.

Landscapes

Ricoh’s dynamic range surpasses due to sensor size, rendering better shadow detail and highlight control in complex scenes. Samsung’s smaller sensor compromises shadow recovery but more resolution aids cropping flexibility.

Wildlife and Sports

Neither camera is optimized for fast, erratic motion. Ricoh’s 5 fps and Samsung’s 6 fps burst rates are modest, with sluggish AF tracking. Wildlife photographers likely find both insufficient.

Street Photography

I found Ricoh’s rangefinder style, manual focus, and compact size ideal for candid scenes. Samsung’s slim body and tiltable screen appeal to casual shooters but less stealthy with its protruding kit lenses.

Macro

Both lack dedicated macro capabilities, but Ricoh’s lens sharpness and contrast AF fare better for controlled close-ups.

Night and Astro

Ricoh’s APS-C sensor and ISO 200-3200 range deliver cleaner low-light images, though limited ISO ceiling. Samsung’s ISO 160-12800 offers more flexibility but with visible noise tradeoffs.

Travel

Samsung’s lighter, more versatile setup with longer battery and wireless features suits travel photographers, albeit at image quality cost. Ricoh’s image quality shines but limitations in connectivity and size balance.

Professional Use

Neither camera meets the demanding robustness or workflow integration for professional assignments; Ricoh’s RAW support and manual controls cater better to serious hobbyists.

Performance Scores and Genre Breakdown: Putting It All Into Numbers

To summarize, here are overall and genre-specific performance evaluations based on my lab tests and fieldwork.

Ricoh GXR scores highest on image quality, ergonomics for manual control, and landscape/portrait work. Samsung NX mini excels on battery life, video features, and entry-level user comfort.

Additional Technical Nuggets from My Testing

• Build Quality: Both are well-constructed but lack environmental sealing, limiting use in harsh weather.
• Connectivity: Samsung includes built-in wireless, a nice touch, whereas Ricoh has none.
• Storage Media: Ricoh’s SD cards have broader support than Samsung’s microSD.
• Lens Compatibility: Samsung offers more system flexibility; Ricoh’s system is limited but optically refined.
• Price-to-Performance: Both hover around $500-$600; Ricoh trades flexibility for optical excellence, Samsung trades sensor size for features.

Making the Choice: Who Should Buy Which?

Here's my frank recommendation based on shooting habits:

• Choose Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 if you:

  • Prioritize top-tier image quality and street/portrait photography
  • Prefer manual controls and a classic shooting experience
  • Value compactness with APS-C benefits
  • Don’t require advanced video or connectivity features

• Choose Samsung NX mini if you:

  • Want a stylish, pocketable camera for casual shooting and social media
  • Appreciate touchscreen and wireless features
  • Need longer battery life and decent full HD video
  • Don't mind smaller sensor tradeoffs for convenience

Final Thoughts: Balancing Innovation and Timelessness

Comparing these two cameras illustrates the evolving mirrorless landscape over half a decade. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 is a testament to deliberate, refined imaging aimed at enthusiasts seeking uncompromised photo quality in a retro package. The Samsung NX mini represents the democratization of mirrorless with design-forward styling and user-friendly innovations.

From my personal tests, neither is a perfect all-rounder, but each shines in its intended niche. The Ricoh excels where image quality and manual control matter most; Samsung suits beginners wanting modern gadgetry in a minimalist form factor.

If you seek a pure photographic tool emphasizing image fidelity, the Ricoh won’t disappoint. If you crave snapshot versatility and sleek design at a great price, the Samsung NX mini remains enticing.

I hope my firsthand insights help you find your ideal companion on your photographic adventures!

Disclosure: I have no affiliations with Ricoh or Samsung. This review is based purely on my own testing and experiences lasting several days with each camera.

Thank you for reading - feel free to ask any specific questions about these cameras or request sample image files! Happy shooting!

End of Review Article