Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46


90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs. Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G: A Deep Dive Into Entry-Level and Compact Photography
Choosing the right camera in today’s diverse market can feel overwhelming. With so many models targeting different needs - from compact travel shooters to modular systems - understanding how a camera’s core capabilities impact your actual shooting experience is crucial. In this article, we put two distinct cameras head to head to help you decide which suits your photography journey better: the Ricoh GXR Mount A12, a modular mirrorless system with an APS-C sensor from 2011, and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, a 2012 compact superzoom that blends point-and-shoot convenience with smartphone-style connectivity.
We’ve extensively tested both cameras, examining their construction, image quality, ergonomics, and real-world usability across photography types. We will also consider their technical strengths and weaknesses, helping you understand their place in today’s creative toolbox.
Getting a Feel for Their Design and Handling
The tactile experience of a camera - how it fits in your hands and controls feel - is fundamental to enjoying photography. Let’s first compare their physical design and control layout, juxtaposing Ricoh’s rangefinder-style mirrorless design with Samsung’s sleek compact body.
-
Ricoh GXR Mount A12: With dimensions of 120 x 70 x 45 mm and a weight of 370 grams, it’s solid and feels substantial. Its mechanical shutter dial and dedicated mode buttons give an old-school, tactile control experience. Its rangefinder-style housing provides a handgrip that accommodates more deliberate shooting styles, often favored by enthusiasts who want to balance portability with manual operations.
-
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G: More pocketable at 129 x 71 x 19 mm and 305 grams, the Galaxy Camera is ultra-slim, akin to a large smartphone but obviously thicker. The extensive touchscreen interface replaces physical controls, leaning on Android OS–style navigation. This makes it highly convenient for quick shooting but less tactile for manual override, which can be a downside for photographers used to physical dials.
For photographers who appreciate the feel of manual dials and prefer a physical shutter button and aperture controls, the GXR Mount A12’s ergonomics provide a comfortable “grown-up” experience. If maximum portability and touchscreen control appeal to you, especially if you’re used to smartphone interaction, Samsung’s Galaxy Camera might be more intuitive.
The top view comparison underscores this distinction: Ricoh’s top plate features dedicated dials, while Samsung’s houses minimal buttons with most functions found on its large touch-enabled back screen.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
A camera’s sensor and its processing capabilities ultimately define your photo quality. Here the differences are stark - the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 uses an APS-C CMOS sensor, while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sports a much smaller 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor typical of compact zooms.
Specification | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | APS-C CMOS | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 370.52 | 28.07 |
Resolution | 12 MP (4288 x 2848) | 16 MP |
Native ISO Range | 200-3200 | 100-3200 |
Low-Pass Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw File Support | Yes | No |
Image quality analysis:
- The APS-C sensor on the Ricoh delivers considerably better image quality due to its larger size, with enhanced dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance. The larger pixels collect more light, translating into cleaner images with less noise at high ISOs.
- The Samsung 1/2.3" sensor is much smaller, common among superzooms, meaning it’s limited in noise control and dynamic range. While it boasts a higher megapixel count, pixel-level quality and tonal gradients don’t match the Ricoh’s more professional sensor.
In practical shooting, you will notice that the Ricoh handles mixed lighting and shadow detail retention better, making it stronger for landscapes and portraits where tonal subtleties matter. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Camera’s smaller sensor is more vulnerable to noise indoors or at night.
Lens and Zoom Capability: Flexibility vs. Versatility
Lens systems largely define what and how you can shoot. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 features a fixed lens modular design; the sensor and lens come attached in one unit, but the GXR mount system allows you to swap modules, providing flexibility for different lenses (though the Mount A12 in itself has a fixed lens).
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sports an outstanding 23-481 mm equivalent zoom - a massive 20.9x zoom that covers everything from wide angles to substantial telephoto reach.
Feature | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Lens Mount | Fixed Lens Module (interchangeable system) | Built-in fixed zoom lens |
Focal Length Equivalent | – (varies per module) | 23-481 mm (20.9x zoom) |
Aperture Range | – | Variable (typical compact) |
Image Stabilization | No | Optical |
Macro Focus Range | N/A | N/A |
For wildlife and sports photography, Samsung’s lengthy zoom is a distinct advantage, allowing you to get closer to distant subjects without carrying heavy glass. It also simplifies pack weight for travel shooters wanting a do-it-all lens.
However, the Ricoh’s larger sensor benefits from higher-quality optics and interchangeable modules to better tailor to portraiture and landscape shooting where sharpness and background blur (“bokeh”) quality are priorities.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness
Autofocus system performance can make or break shooting experiences, especially in fast-action environments like wildlife or sports photography.
Category | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
AF System Type | Contrast-detection only | Contrast-detection only |
Phase-detection AF | No | No |
Number of Focus Points | Multi-area | Single area |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
Tracking Autofocus | No | No |
Manual Focus | Yes | No |
Neither camera includes phase-detection autofocus or sophisticated tracking AF, reflecting their entry-level and compact status at their launch period.
- The Ricoh’s contrast-detection autofocus with multi-area coverage is best suited for static subjects but will be slower and less reliable for moving targets.
- Samsung’s Galaxy Camera autofocus is simpler without continuous AF modes, leaning on touch-to-focus for ease but limiting control.
For wildlife and sports shooting, you may find both systems wanting in autofocus speed and tracking. The Ricoh edges ahead due to continuous AF support, but neither camera is ideal for professional action photography.
LCD Screens and User Interface Experience
Monitoring your shots and camera navigation is essential, so the LCD screen and interface matter.
- The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has a 3-inch fixed LCD with 920k-dot resolution, sufficient for checking focus and framing, but the lack of touch controls and no live view autofocus hampers usability.
- The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sports a larger 4.8-inch HD Super Clear touchscreen (308 ppi) that supports gestures and taps, resembling a smartphone in feel. This enables a modern, fast workflow and on-screen control customization.
For reviewing images and menu navigation, the Galaxy Camera’s touch screen excels for casual users and those transitioning from mobile devices. The Ricoh, designed before touchscreens became common, may feel dated but caters better to photographers who prefer physical buttons.
Video Capabilities: From Basic to Sharp Full HD
While photography is our focus, video features matter as well.
Feature | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 at 24fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Video Stabilization | No | Optical Image Stabilization |
Microphone/Headphone Ports | No | No |
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G delivers Full HD 1080p at 30fps, providing much sharper, modern video quality with optical stabilization to reduce shake - a useful feature for casual video recording or vlogging.
Ricoh’s video maxes at 720p, with dated Motion JPEG compression, resulting in larger files and lower quality footage. The absence of stabilization further limits handheld video usability.
If video is a priority, Samsung’s camera gives you more versatility and better footage quality.
Battery Life and Storage: Durability and Convenience on the Go
Good battery life ensures less interruption, and flexible storage options mean you can shoot without worrying about space.
Specification | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Battery Life (Shots) | About 330 | Not specified, average for compacts |
Battery Type | Proprietary Battery Pack (DB-90) | Not specified |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC + Internal | MicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Number of Slots | 1 | 1 |
Ricoh’s 330-shot battery life is respectable for mirrorless of its era but outpaced by today’s standards. Samsung doesn’t specify but likely falls in the same ballpark for casual use.
They both slot one memory card, with Samsung using space-saving microSD cards suitable for its compact design and smartphone integration.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Connectivity options expand how you transfer and share your photos.
Feature | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Built-in Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
GPS | No | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Bluetooth | No | No |
USB Port | USB 2.0 | None |
HDMI Out | Yes | Yes |
Samsung stands out with built-in Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity (4G) plus GPS, designed around instant sharing and wireless image uploads, blending the camera into your mobile workflow. By contrast, Ricoh is strictly tethered via USB or card transfers, reflecting pre-smartphone integration era values.
Real-World Shooting Across Genres: Where Each Camera Shines
Let’s now examine their practical application, covering diverse photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
- Ricoh: Better APS-C sensor yields nuanced skin tones and pleasant bokeh from suitable modules. Manual focus and aperture priority modes give fine creative control for depth-of-field effects.
- Samsung: Limited background blur due to small sensor and absence of manual controls. Image processing can over-sharpen skin tones, resulting in less natural portraiture.
Winner: Ricoh, for higher fidelity and control.
Landscape Photography
- Ricoh’s wider dynamic range captures subtle details in highlights and shadows.
- Samsung’s superzoom offers convenience to recompose wide or tight, but suffers from noise at base ISO.
Winner: Ricoh, for image quality and sensor size.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Samsung’s extended telephoto reach and optical IS deliver value for field shooting.
- Ricoh’s slower AF and absence of tracking limit burst and action speed.
Winner: Samsung for reach and stabilization, but neither excels for fast-action focus.
Street Photography
- Ricoh’s compact form and quiet operation make discrete shooting easier.
- Samsung’s touchscreen interface can be cumbersome in fast street shooting.
Winner: Ricoh for responsiveness and semi-manual control.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera offers specialized macro capabilities; Ricoh modules might edge out with manual focus precision.
- Samsung lacks manual focus and macro lensing.
Winner: Ricoh for finer manual focus.
Night and Astro Photography
- Ricoh’s APS-C sensor and ISO 3200 aid noise control in low light.
- Samsung’s sensor is pulled thin at high ISO; noise is an issue.
Winner: Ricoh for superior low-light results.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung supports Full HD with OIS, better for handheld footage.
- Ricoh limited to 720p without stabilization.
Winner: Samsung.
Travel Photography
- Samsung’s thin, lightweight body and huge zoom range are perfect for all-in-one travel convenience.
- Ricoh offers better image quality but requires you to carry separate lens modules.
Winner: Samsung for portability; Ricoh for quality-conscious travel shooters.
Professional Work
- Ricoh offers raw format support, manual controls, and better color fidelity.
- Samsung lacks raw, manual controls, and has limited workflow integration.
Winner: Ricoh.
Sample Image Comparison
To appreciate these differences in the field, here’s a gallery of side-by-side sample photographs captured under various conditions.
Notice the Ricoh files show finer detail and more natural color rendition, particularly in challenging light and portraits. Samsung’s samples shine in zoom versatility but display softness and noise in shadows.
Comprehensive Performance Ratings
We’ve rigorously scored their overall capabilities and genre-specific strengths.
Category | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 8.5/10 | 6/10 |
Autofocus | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Handling | 7.5/10 | 7/10 |
Video | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Portability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Connectivity | 2/10 | 9/10 |
Overall Score | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
Bottom Line: Who Should Use Each Camera?
To conclude, here’s our tailored recommendations:
Choose the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 if:
- You prioritize image quality, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light shooting.
- You want manual control and are comfortable with the modular lens system.
- You seek a compact mirrorless camera with solid ergonomics and interchangeable lenses.
- You don’t need advanced connectivity but want RAW file support for professional workflows.
- You appreciate building fundamental skills in manual photography and exposure.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G if:
- Your focus is versatility and simplicity with a massive zoom range in a small package.
- You want easy sharing and instant upload via built-in 4G and Wi-Fi.
- You shoot mainly casual snapshots, travel, or video and value the touchscreen OS interface.
- You rarely shoot in manual mode and don’t mind JPEG-only output.
- Portability and zoom reach without lugging extra lenses are vital.
Final Thoughts: Exploring Your Photography Path
Both the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G reflect exciting approaches to accessible photography from the early 2010s. The Ricoh offers serious photographers a taste of modular flexibility and APS-C image quality packed in an enthusiast-friendly body. Samsung’s Galaxy Camera challenges conventions by embedding smartphone-like connectivity and zoom versatility in a pocket-friendly form.
Whether you lean toward crafting images with manual precision or capturing moments on the fly with all-in-one convenience, both cameras can be gateways - but understand their limitations alongside strengths to align them with your creative goals.
For further exploration, try hands-on testing to see which interface feels intuitive to you, review sample files in conditions similar to your shooting style, and consider your lens expansion plans.
No matter which route you take, both cameras invite you to get out there and create, supporting your journey to better photography step by step.
Ready to take the next step?
Check out lens modules for the Ricoh GXR to expand your capabilities or explore accessories for the Samsung Galaxy Camera to enhance its connectivity and video. Whichever camera excites you, keep learning, experimenting, and making images that tell your story.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-08-05 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $349 | $550 |