Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung DV300F front
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung DV300F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Overview

The following is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and DV300F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 21 months earlier than the DV300F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the DV300F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung DV300F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC DV300F 
Focus manually  Dial accurate focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 DV300F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedJanuary 2012March 2010Newer by 21 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung DV300F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC DV300F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither provides Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the DV300F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DV300F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DV300F.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung DV300F will resolve more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
Samsung DV300F Portrait photography factors
36
 manual focus
 supports RAW formats
 no liveview
 resolution not great (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
34
 resolution is good (16MP)
 comes with face detect autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 manual exposure not possible
 cannot use external flash
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung DV300F
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
63
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than average (133g)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Samsung DV300F Sports photography factors
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 low frames per second (2.0 fps)
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
 lacks phase detect AF
44
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking focus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
Samsung DV300F Travel photography info
60
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 resolution not great (10MP)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than average (133g)
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (25mm)
 missing Timelapse mode
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung DV300F as a Landscape photography camera
47
 manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
43
 decently wide (25mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 resolution is good (16MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 manual exposure not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging features
Samsung DV300F Vlogging features
28
 fairly wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
 no microphone socket
33
 decently wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with face detect autofocus
 lighter than average (133 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 missing microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV300F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung DV300F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung DV300F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung DV300F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-03-18 2012-01-02
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.5-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 4.10 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 133 grams (0.29 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP88
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $349 $200