Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus VH-515, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-610 was manufactured 19 months earlier than the VH-515 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-610 matches up vs the VH-515 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-610 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus VH-515
TG-610 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus TG-610
VH-515 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 19 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus VH-515
TG-610 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-610 has external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus VH-515 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-610 compared to the VH-515.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and VH-515 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-610 and VH-515.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-610 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older TG-610 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Olympus VH-515 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $223 | $648 |