Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19064/19064172b06e5d452c23117f62fb823105c4f36b" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX200
- Later Model is Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX210, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and NX210 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 3 years prior to the NX210 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the NX210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX210. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung NX210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
NX210 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | March 2010 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC enjoys physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung NX210 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c49e3/c49e3c3d2e9c4fb3bd2b814564faf9fee91bbd10" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX210 is 85 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07be7/07be719d6ff9aa28e42bfa8a4f12bec68389b7e2" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX210.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Samsung NX210 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/113e0/113e05276a988315863be4e092e64a87ebff7bc7" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bc0c/0bc0cefd2c87f77c6b8e63c03dbbd58a72ea874c" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung NX210 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2012-08-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | 330 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $349 | $625 |