Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung SL820 front
Portability
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung SL820
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Also Known as IT100
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is pretty close but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and SL820 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 14 months later than the SL820 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the SL820 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung SL820

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL820 
LaunchedMarch 2010February 2009Fresher by 14 months
Manual focus  More accurate focus
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 SL820 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL820

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL820 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC enjoys outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the SL820.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL820 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL820.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung SL820 will render extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography features
Samsung SL820 Portrait photography features
36
 manual focus
 saves RAW formats
 no liveview feature
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
26
 supports face detect autofocus
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 low resolution (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung SL820 as a Street photography camera
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
47
 no articulating screen
 no image stabilization
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung SL820 as a Sports photography camera
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
17
 lack of shutter priority mode
 no image stabilization
 low resolution (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
Samsung SL820 Travel photography features
60
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
57
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 low resolution (12 megapixels)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL820 Landscape photography factors
47
 manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 no manual control
 no image stabilization
 low resolution (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL820 Vlogging highlights
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
 missing external microphone port
27
 relatively wide (28mm)
 supports face detect autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 no image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL820 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL820
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung SL820
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung SL820
Otherwise known as - IT100
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-03-18 2009-02-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.4-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $349 $280