Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB350F (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 4 years prior to the WB350F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB350F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB350F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 WB350F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedJanuary 2014March 2010Newer by 46 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB350F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB350F 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB350F.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB350F is 85 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB350F.

As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
36
manual focus
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
40
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung WB350F
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (355g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography advice
Samsung WB350F Sports photography advice
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
50
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
60
lighter than competition in class (355g)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
69
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography advice
47
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
50
has manual focus
really wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
28
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
34
really wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB350F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-03-18 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lb) 276 gr (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $349 $260