Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19064/19064172b06e5d452c23117f62fb823105c4f36b" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB350F (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 4 years prior to the WB350F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB350F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB350F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | March 2010 | Newer by 46 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB350F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a96c3/a96c3e29ce74a1509ea1258c33a6d732c2171cdc" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB350F is 85 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43fdf/43fdfc6b7bd7fe088996203646d23dacd3249438" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB350F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74e40/74e403fcc6a98360805cb0e460787cdd44e4b649" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b57bd/b57bd1d6bc68c2ae3425dc95b9abb60cbbb70d33" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $349 | $260 |