Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is relatively similar but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-70 was manufactured 6 years later than the NX300 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-70 scores vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung NX300
WG-70 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 76 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh WG-70
NX300 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+538k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX300
WG-70 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-70 against the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46e93/46e93e1ce6cfad1d739975a3a8d7eaa2f009cc76" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and NX300 is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a778d/a778d8566be3d8d62213c76ba657832c2d13afd0" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and NX300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-70 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f1ae/2f1aee7fe19c90b74efbd11c9bb0894fdc9c0fd2" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99896/99896a4e35611d6640d98772d7b54ed25eff7a97" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 331 gr (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 330 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $280 | $750 |