Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the PX (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe PX was brought out 2 years after the TL225 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the PX matches up versus the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX and Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung TL225
PX | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 25 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh PX
TL225 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 230k | Crisper display (+922k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL225
PX | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the PX versus the TL225.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the PX and TL225.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to produce greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer PX should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Ricoh PX | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh PX | Samsung TL225 |
Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-08-16 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) | 187 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $488 |