Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the PX (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the PX (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe PX was revealed 7 years after the SD10 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the PX scores versus the SD10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX and Sigma SD10. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma SD10
PX | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | March 2004 | Newer by 91 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Ricoh PX
SD10 | PX |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma SD10
PX | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh PX has outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the PX versus the SD10.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and SD10 is 95 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and SD10.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The PX having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh PX will deliver extra detail because of its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent PX should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma SD10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh PX | Sigma SD10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2004-03-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 1.8" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $329 | $198 |