Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony A300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is relatively similar but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was unveiled 5 years later than the A300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-630 iHS scores against the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Sony A300
TG-630 iHS | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 61 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
A300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Sony A300
TG-630 iHS | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has exterior dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0538c/0538c29f2d8857346b7778b20cf2b20945768de2" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aa5/b0aa50ec71102737c396805def7791079cc42c4f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and A300.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-630 iHS having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will deliver greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer TG-630 iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1af3/d1af39ed6b890af796f2d7d0956d8dd29109c68a" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb75/1cb75b58d344523d697e7a1ede1cc344c4847152" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) | 632 grams (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $200 | $0 |