Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
![Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-30/Ricoh-WG-30-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-5-GPS/Ricoh-WG-5-GPS-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof cameras and both are produced by Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The WG-30 was introduced 4 months earlier than the WG-5 GPS so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-30 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
WG-30 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh WG-30
WG-5 GPS | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
WG-30 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2015 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30 offers physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-30 compared to the WG-5 GPS.
![Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-30-vs-Ricoh-WG-5-GPS-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and WG-5 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-30-vs-Ricoh-WG-5-GPS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-30 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
![Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-30-vs-Ricoh-WG-5-GPS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-30-vs-Ricoh-WG-5-GPS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-10-09 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $428 | $500 |