Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-30W was unveiled 10 months later than the WB2200F so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-30W matches up versus the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung WB2200F
| WG-30W | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 |  | January 2014 | More recent by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-30W
| WB2200F | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung WB2200F
| WG-30W | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30W has physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-30W and the WB2200F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30W and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and WB2200F.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-30W will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-10-09 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 708 gr (1.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $280 | $599 |