Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Below, we are matching up the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was manufactured 8 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the GX-1L in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung GX-1L. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung GX-1L
WG-4 GPS | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2006 | Fresher by 97 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GX-1L | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-1L
WG-4 GPS | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/639b3/639b39d57e7eb188ba0bf36560146a865fec6ddc" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and GX-1L is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a02fa/a02fa8a8cc55182dc14c9e56bb6aeab334883943" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and GX-1L.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1381/a138183567ed4a653cf0a65061cdb3827ec7c1e7" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41b3d/41b3df8878920408d0f09ebf46ed8ac3e71e3524" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1L |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2006-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 7.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 570g (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $210 | $0 |