Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung ST150F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 14 months later than the ST150F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the ST150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST150F
WG-4 GPS | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
ST150F | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST150F
WG-4 GPS | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung ST150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the ST150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and ST150F is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and ST150F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photos however you should factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST150F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 114g (0.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $210 | $300 |