Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-4 GPS was released 3 years later than the ST95 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST95

 WG-4 GPS ST95 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2011More recent by 38 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 ST95 WG-4 GPS 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95

 WG-4 GPS ST95 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution460k460kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the ST95.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and ST95.

Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
41
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
30
MP count decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography advice
Samsung ST95 Street photography advice
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than others (235g)
50
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
maximum ISO low (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography factors
Samsung ST95 Sports photography factors
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 per charge)
no phase detect AF
27
MP count decent (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography details
Samsung ST95 Travel photography details
69
weather proofing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 CIPA)
heavier than others (235 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
71
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography highlights
54
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proofing
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low battery power (240 CIPA)
38
good maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
MP count decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
34
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic support
heavier than others (235 grams)
27
good maximum aperture (f)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSamsung ST95
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-4 GPS Samsung ST95
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2014-02-05 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 125 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 235g (0.52 pounds) -
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $210 $145