Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 GPS was released 3 years later than the ST95 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST95
WG-4 GPS | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
ST95 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95
WG-4 GPS | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the ST95.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and ST95.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $210 | $145 |