Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was launched 11 years after the SD9 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the SD9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma SD9
WG-4 GPS | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2002 | Newer by 137 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper display (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
SD9 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma SD9
WG-4 GPS | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d08a0/d08a0d4fcc1debf3d5f215b2336e8b863fc82b3f" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and SD9 is 90 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb0dc/bb0dcd2c8bfbba3e4b28144999e6630e51d4ab02" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and SD9.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/951cf/951cfd628dd27515777d0b3fd8423c5fea007a93" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81e99/81e997ddd02921ddc0bcb816f745939921e81bb6" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $210 | $3,001 |