Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Announced July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony TX30, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the TX30 (18MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 7 months after the TX30 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the TX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony TX30
| WG-4 GPS | TX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | July 2013 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TX30 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX30
| WG-4 GPS | TX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony TX30 has sizing of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony TX30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the TX30.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and TX30 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and TX30.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony TX30 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX30 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-07-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | OLED monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 141 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $210 | $230 |