Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-4 was released 3 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-4 scores vs the HZ50W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung HZ50W
WG-4 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh WG-4
HZ50W | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung HZ50W
WG-4 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 compared to the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b09c4/b09c438e676f5e0ab2e75fcf8047295ad9ce5c60" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48de1/48de1fe9a4410df11f0c02da32731f9990db1d38" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and HZ50W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a29cf/a29cfd4bb5fdf467c69fb30ab707452fbd6541cb" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a5d/68a5d445634e1670a52482bb5798122882453cf8" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ50W |
Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $330 | $250 |