Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ad4/26ad408e09a190dab4a1204a32d9674f2ed6ea5e" alt="Samsung NX500 front Samsung NX500 front"
87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NX500 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-4 was announced 12 months before the NX500 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-4 matches up against the NX500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung NX500. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung NX500
WG-4 | NX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Ricoh WG-4
NX500 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | Fresher by 12 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+576k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX500
WG-4 | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung NX500 has sizing of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 vs the NX500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689d9/689d90c6817bdb72951b10859d20ccb6bf38c35d" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NX500 is 90 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0947/e094760149899c76e9ae124e5da8024327177962" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and NX500.
To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX500 will give extra detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older WG-4 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edab/7edabd9f1c26a22e6837a6f63f0405f2c989962c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/800bb/800bb401fe1e6cd6f300c9ba9fb26f62aea85cff" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX500 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 287g (0.63 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $330 | $800 |