Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 was introduced 5 years later than the A200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-4 matches up against the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A200
WG-4 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | July 2008 | More recent by 68 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-4
A200 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A200
WG-4 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 vs the A200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and A200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 will give extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $330 | $100 |