Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Introduced July 2008
  • Successor is Sony A230
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Overview

Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The WG-4 was introduced 5 years later than the A200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-4 matches up against the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A200

 WG-4 A200 
IntroducedFebruary 2014July 2008More recent by 68 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-4

 A200 WG-4 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A200

 WG-4 A200 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 vs the A200.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and A200.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 will give extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A200 as a Portrait photography camera
41
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
53
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography information
Sony A200 Sports photography information
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
Travel photography with Sony A200
72
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
46
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
Sony A200 Landscape photography details
54
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
53
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
Vlogging with Sony A200
36
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
9
no video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A200
 Ricoh WG-4Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Type Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2014-02-05 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 lb) 572g (1.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $330 $100