Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-4 was launched 6 years later than the A300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-4 scores vs the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A300
WG-4 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2008 | More recent by 74 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-4
A300 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A300
WG-4 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 provides external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 compared to the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa95b/fa95b1f7c02d5774192030c0cbc2bed139458163" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/817b1/817b1da66d522d8f55e39c5bb9bb4efa740bb09f" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and A300.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49751/497511f7726f49b304372d5880e65088a43f301a" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e82f/8e82ff1b1d31c364ddb723391be227cc86de130b" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 632g (1.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $330 | $0 |