Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Successor is Sony A330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WG-4 was launched 6 years later than the A300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-4 scores vs the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A300

 WG-4 A300 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2008More recent by 74 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-4

 A300 WG-4 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A300

 WG-4 A300 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 provides external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 compared to the A300.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and A300.

Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4
Portrait photography with Sony A300
41
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
59
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
Street photography with Sony A300
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
74
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
Sony A300 Sports photography factors
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A300 as a Travel photography camera
72
weather sealing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery life (240 shots)
does not have selfie friendly display
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A300 Landscape photography highlights
54
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
57
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging details
Sony A300 Vlogging details
36
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic port
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A300
 Ricoh WG-4Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2014-02-05 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 lbs) 632g (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Compact Flash
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $330 $0