Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Revealed February 2010
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and TX5 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and TX5 (1/2.4") have totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was launched 4 years later than the TX5 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 scores versus the TX5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony TX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony TX5
WG-4 | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | February 2010 | More recent by 49 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX5 over the Ricoh WG-4
TX5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX5
WG-4 | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony TX5 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 against the TX5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TX5 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and TX5.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 2.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $330 | $239 |