Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as PL70
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-5 GPS was released 5 years after the SL720 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung SL720. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung SL720
| WG-5 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SL720 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720
| WG-5 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with physical dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the SL720.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and SL720 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and SL720.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL720 |
| Also Known as | - | PL70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-07-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $119 |
