Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as PL70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-5 GPS was released 5 years after the SL720 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung SL720. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung SL720
| WG-5 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SL720 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720
| WG-5 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with physical dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL720 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the SL720.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and SL720 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and SL720.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL720 |
| Also Known as | - | PL70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-07-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $119 |