Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7925d/7925d4ec856623fe4c6a6caf3f9339a0fcd66771" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front"
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony HX400V, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HX400V (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 2 years later than the HX400V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II grades versus the HX400V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony HX400V
E-M1 II | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 32 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Olympus E-M1 II
HX400V | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX400V
E-M1 II | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony HX400V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II against the HX400V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3983b/3983badfd7001d2fa9fae7d77d52575ebbc294fc" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and HX400V is 68 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b66e7/b66e7f4ee929f946d4ae384126b7a68e196b19ac" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HX400V.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II offers the bigger sensor which will make achieving bokeh simpler. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5543d/5543d564b4cea7cce221a1dc55712fbba41949df" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbcef/cbcefa882336ad21080ff7ad89d1c28fe7069d3c" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 660g (1.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 300 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Price at release | $1,700 | $448 |