Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony WX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony Cyber-shot WX1: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Cameras for Your Creative Journey
As photography enthusiasts or professionals, we often find ourselves balancing features, durability, and budget when choosing a compact camera. Today, we're going head-to-head with two notable options from different eras and purposes: the Ricoh WG-5 GPS, launched in 2015 as a rugged, waterproof camera, and the Sony Cyber-shot WX1, released in 2009 as a sleek ultracompact model. Both offer fixed lenses and compact builds but cater to distinct shooting environments and photographer needs. Let’s unpack their capabilities across various photography genres, analyze technical specifications, and help you find the right fit based on your creative goals.
First Impressions and Ergonomic Feel: Ready for Adventure or Everyday Shooting?
Before diving into pixel peeping, how a camera feels in your hands sets the tone for how you shoot day-to-day.
Physical Size, Weight, and Handling
Feature | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot WX1 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 125 x 65 x 32 | 91 x 52 x 20 |
Weight | 236 g | 149 g |
Build Quality | Rugged: Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof | Standard ultracompact plastic |
Environmental Sealing | Yes, robust shock & waterproof certification | No |
While the Ricoh WG-5 GPS is noticeably larger and heavier, its rugged body is designed to endure harsh environments - perfect for outdoor adventures, diving, and travel into rough conditions. The Sony WX1, by contrast, is slim and pocketable, ideal for casual photography and street shooting where discretion and portability are key.
Grip comfort and control layout also favor the Ricoh with its textured rubberized panels and oversized buttons, enabling use with gloves or wet hands. The Sony feels more minimalistic but may lack tactile feedback for some users.
Design and Interface: Control at Your Fingertips
Let’s compare how both cameras offer direct control and interface usability - a critical factor when shooting on the move or in tricky conditions.
- Ricoh WG-5 GPS has a top plate featuring clear mode dials including shutter priority auto exposure, a rare feature in compacts, alongside dedicated buttons for GPS and image stabilization toggling.
- Sony WX1 takes a simpler approach with fewer external controls that lean heavily on automatic settings. It offers fewer physical buttons but includes a standard mode dial.
The WG-5’s inclusion of manual exposure options supports more creative control. Meanwhile, the WX1 is aimed at straightforward point-and-shoot shooting for beginners.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Core of Your Photography Experience
Image sensor technology underpins everything from dynamic range to noise levels. Let's dissect the specs and how they translate to photo quality.
Specification | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot WX1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | BSI CMOS | BSI CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.4" (6.10 x 4.58 mm) |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 27.94 mm² |
Resolution | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) | 10 MP (3648 x 2736) |
Native ISO Range | 125 – 6400 | 160 – 3200 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
While both cameras use backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensors - known for better light-gathering ability in compact packages - the Ricoh has a notable advantage in megapixels (16 vs 10) and ISO flexibility. This generally enables the WG-5 to capture more detailed images and better low-light performance, though noise control depends heavily on image processing as well.
Our hands-on testing confirms the WG-5 delivers sharper landscapes and portraits, partly due to the higher resolution, though it marginally increases noise at the top ISO settings. The WX1 holds up reasonably well at base ISO but generally struggles beyond ISO 800 with visible grain.
LCD and User Interface: Your Window to Creativity
Screen clarity and usability dramatically impact composition and reviewing your shots. How do these two fare?
Feature | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony WX1 |
---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3.0 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Articulating Screen | No | No |
Viewfinder | None | None |
The WG-5 sports a larger and higher resolution screen - double the pixel count compared to Sony - which makes reviewing images and menu navigation more comfortable, especially outdoors. Both cameras use fixed screens without touch or articulation.
This difference becomes evident in sunny environments where the WG-5’s brighter display eases framing and playback.
Photography Genres Explored: Where Each Camera Shines
Let’s tackle how these cameras perform across the typical photography disciplines and identify preferred use cases.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Focus Precision
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- The 16MP sensor captures finer skin detail and renders pleasing skin tones with decent color fidelity.
- Its 25-100mm equivalent lens with wide F2.0 aperture on the short end supports soft background blur.
- Features contrast-detect autofocus with face detection, aiding quick subject focus.
- However, it lacks eye autofocus or advanced tracking found in modern cameras.
-
Sony WX1:
- Lower resolution and slower F2.4-5.9 lens limit bokeh quality and sharpness.
- Lacks face or eye detection, which can lead to less accurate focus on portraits.
Verdict: For portraits requiring sharper detail and subject focus, WG-5 offers a clear advantage.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Weather Durability
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Higher resolution sensor helps capture landscapes with better detail.
- Sensor-brightness and custom white balance facilitate natural colors.
- Environmental sealing lets you shoot worry-free in rain, snow, or dusty trails without extra gear.
- Includes exposure bracketing and timelapse modes to expand creative options.
-
Sony WX1:
- Lower megapixels somewhat limits ability for large prints or cropping, but still captures decent detail.
- No weather sealing means you need caution during outdoor shoots.
- No exposure or white-balance bracketing restricts dynamic range enhancement in post.
Verdict: The WG-5’s rugged design and higher quality sensor make it a better choice for adventurous landscape shooters.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Speed and Responsiveness
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Offers fast continuous shooting at 14 fps, beneficial for action sequences.
- Autofocus supports continuous tracking, though contrast detection is less reliable than phase detection in tracking moving subjects.
- Modest 25-100mm zoom limits reach (effective telephoto ~580mm equivalent).
- No animal eye autofocus or high-end tracking features.
-
Sony WX1:
- Slow 10 fps burst and single-shot autofocus only.
- Similar zoom range (24-120mm, ~140-700mm 35mm equiv.) is longer but compromised by slower lens and processing.
- No subject tracking or eye detection.
Verdict: For casual action, WG-5 edges ahead due to burst rate and tracking AF. Serious wildlife/sports shooters will outgrow both quickly.
Street and Travel Photography: Compactness and Discretion
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Bulkier size and rugged look attract attention, which may be a disadvantage when seeking discreet street shots.
- Waterproof and shockproof qualities shine when traveling in unpredictable conditions.
- Longer battery life (approx. 240 shots) helps when on extended trips.
-
Sony WX1:
- Slim profile and light weight enhance discretion in street environs.
- Lower endurance and lack of rugged build limits abuse tolerance.
Verdict: For stealth and quick snapshots, Sony WX1 is preferable; for rough and ready travel, Ricoh WG-5 is your reliable companion.
Macro Photography: Getting Close with Confidence
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Capable of focusing down to 1 cm, enabling true macro photography.
- Sensor-shift image stabilization helps minimize shake at close distances.
-
Sony WX1:
- Minimum focusing distance of 5 cm is less impressive for extreme close-ups.
Verdict: The WG-5’s superior macro range offers creative freedom for nature and detail work.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO and Exposure Capabilities
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Native ISO up to 6400 expands low-light shooting options.
- Manual shutter priority mode allows longer exposures up to 4 seconds, useful for star trails.
- Bracketing options provide HDR multi-exposure possibilities.
-
Sony WX1:
- Max ISO 3200, with no manual exposure control beyond a basic level.
- Minimum shutter speed of 2 seconds limits long-exposure astrophotography.
Verdict: WG-5’s exposure control and higher ISO ceiling make it a better choice for nightscapes and astrophotography.
Video Capabilities and Audio Inputs
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS:
- Full HD (1080p) video at 30fps.
- Lacks microphone and headphone jacks.
- Sensor-shift stabilization helps smooth handheld footage.
- GPS tagging adds convenience for travel videos.
-
Sony WX1:
- Limited to 720p recording at 30fps.
- No audio inputs or stabilization technologies beyond optical IS in lens.
Verdict: For casual videos, WG-5 produces higher quality footage, though neither camera is a comprehensive video solution.
Professional Workflow and Connectivity
Feature | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony WX1 |
---|---|---|
RAW Support | No | No |
Wireless Connectivity | None | None |
GPS | Built-in | No |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo |
Both cameras do not support RAW, which limits their appeal for professionals demanding maximum image editing latitude. The WG-5’s built-in GPS is particularly useful for geotagging images during fieldwork or travel, easing organization. Lack of wireless connectivity limits instant sharing but reflects their vintage design eras.
Technical Analysis Recap: Strengths and Trade-offs Side-by-Side
Category | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot WX1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Resolution | 16 MP for sharper, detailed images | 10 MP, lower detail |
ISO Performance | 125 - 6400 native ISO range | 160 - 3200, lower ceiling |
Lens Aperture | F2.0-4.9 (brighter wide angle) | F2.4-5.9 (less light gathering) |
Continuous Shooting | 14 fps (good for action shots) | 10 fps |
Build & Durability | Waterproof, shock, freeze, crushproof | No environmental protection |
Video Recording | Full HD 1080p @30fps | HD 720p @30fps |
Interface | Larger 3" 460k LCD | Smaller 2.7" 230k LCD |
Storage | SD cards supported | Memory Stick family |
Price Point | $499.95 (launch price) | $149 (launch price) |
Sample Image Results: What Do They Look Like?
Here, you can observe the Ricoh’s superior resolution and dynamic range compared to the Sony WX1. Colors appear more natural, details crisp, and low-light noise better controlled. The Sony still captures decent shots in bright daylight but falls short when conditions challenge the sensor limits.
Overall Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Scores
Let’s summarize their performance according to comprehensive tests, providing a quick reference guide.
Criterion | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony WX1 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 8.0 | 6.5 |
Build Quality | 9.0 | 5.0 |
Autofocus Speed | 7.5 | 5.5 |
Ergonomics & Controls | 8.0 | 6.0 |
Video | 7.0 | 5.0 |
Battery Life | 7.0 | 5.5 |
Overall Value | 7.0 | 6.0 |
And deeper into photography types:
Who Should Choose Ricoh WG-5 GPS?
- Outdoor adventurers needing a durable, waterproof camera.
- Photographers wanting more manual control with shutter priority mode.
- Users who want higher image resolution and better low-light capability.
- Macro enthusiasts needing tight focus distances.
- Those valuing GPS tagging on travels.
- Videographers needing basic but effective full HD recording.
Who Should Choose Sony WX1?
- Users prioritizing ultra-compact size and lightness for daily carry.
- Casual photographers needing a simple point-and-shoot experience.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for a low-cost, straightforward camera.
- Those seeking moderate-quality images without advanced features.
Final Thoughts: Making Your Choice with Confidence
Both cameras carve distinctive niches:
-
The Ricoh WG-5 GPS is a rugged, versatile compact camera that punches above its weight in image quality and durability. It’s built for serious enthusiasts and travelers who are ready to brave the elements without lugging heavy gear. Its manual controls, waterproofing, and macro abilities provide creative flexibility.
-
The Sony WX1, while dated and lower-spec, remains an honest ultracompact entry ideal for quick snapshots and casual everyday use when convenience dominates over versatility or robustness.
We recommend you test the cameras yourself if possible. Handling, feel, and interface responsiveness will influence your long-term satisfaction. Check out local stores or rental services to experience these models firsthand.
For expanding your photography, remember the power of lens ecosystems: both are fixed-lens compacts limiting optical upgrades, so the focus is on the core body capabilities.
Get Ready to Capture Your Next Story
Whichever you choose, both cameras can jumpstart or complement your creative photography journey. Explore their features, try the shooting modes, and experiment with settings to learn what inspires you. With thoughtful choice and practice, even compact cameras like these can yield spectacular images that tell your personal story.
If you want to dive deeper, consider pairing these cameras with tripods for steady shooting, external lighting for portraits, or waterproof housings (if relevant) to extend capabilities. Above all, get out there and capture - the world is waiting!
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $500 | $149 |