Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-50 was announced 4 years after the DV150F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 matches up against the DV150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung DV150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung DV150F
| WG-50 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 54 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Ricoh WG-50
| DV150F | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung DV150F
| WG-50 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-50 versus the DV150F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and DV150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and DV150F.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photos but you need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The newer WG-50 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung DV150F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $280 | $150 |