Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung PL200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-50 was released 6 years later than the PL200 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-50 matches up versus the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung PL200
| WG-50 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 84 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| PL200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung PL200
| WG-50 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 provides physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-50 versus the PL200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and PL200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The newer WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung PL200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $0 |
