Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-50 was introduced 7 years after the TL205 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the WG-50 matches up vs the TL205 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL205. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL205
| WG-50 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 90 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh WG-50
| TL205 | WG-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL205
| WG-50 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 offers outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 and the TL205.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and TL205 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and TL205.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL100 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $180 |