Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H90
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Released February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90: A Detailed Comparison for the Informed Photographer
When photographers scout for dependable compact cameras, the choices can be puzzling given how quickly technology evolves. Today, I’m diving deep into two well-regarded compact models that target quite different users and shooting styles: the Ricoh WG-50 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. Both offer a 16MP 1/2.3" sensor and fixed superzoom lenses, but beyond that, they are designed for distinct purposes - from rugged adventure shooting to versatile zoom coverage.
Over the last decade-plus, I’ve tested thousands of cameras - from pro DSLRs to rugged compacts - so I’ll bring that experience to bear on how these two stack up across multiple photography categories and real-world use. Our examination covers technical specs, actual image quality, focusing, ergonomics, and value for various shooting scenarios. Whether you’re an outdoor enthusiast needing a tough companion, or a casual zoom zoomer craving telephoto reach, this guide will help you spot the key differences to make the right choice.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
Right out of the gate, these cameras aren’t quite apples-to-apples in their design philosophy. The Ricoh WG-50 is a rugged, waterproof compact - think of it as a digital field assistant ready for weather extremes and rough handling. The Sony H90, meanwhile, is a traditional superzoom pocket camera aimed at flexibility and zoom versatility, ideal for travel and family snapshots.

The WG-50’s dimensions of 123x62x30mm and a weight of 193g confer a solid, confidently grippy feel, aided by textured rubberized surfaces that resist slips - crucial outdoors. The Sony H90 is slightly smaller at 105x60x34mm but heavier at 222g, largely due to its longer zoom lens barrel and battery. Its smoother plastic casing prioritizes portability over rough treatment.
Turning to the top panel layout, the control schemes tell their stories clearly.

The WG-50 incorporates basic but tactile buttons with a clear underwater mode button - exactly what you want when gloves or wet fingers dominate. The Sony H90 offers manual exposure control dials and a mode dial, showing its appeal to those who want more photographic control, albeit in a less rugged chassis.
Sensor and Image Quality - Same Size, Different Outcomes?
Both cameras feature a 16-megapixel 1/2.3" sensor measuring approximately 6.17x4.55mm with Bayer CFA and anti-alias filters, but sensor type differs: Ricoh sports a BSI CMOS sensor, whereas the Sony employs a CCD sensor.

From a technical viewpoint, CMOS sensors - like Ricoh’s BSI variant - generally outperform CCD in low light, dynamic range, and speed due to advances in readout circuitry and noise handling. The WG-50’s max ISO 6400 extends its low-light flexibility compared to the H90’s max ISO 3200. However, due to the older CCD technology, the Sony can render colors with vibrancy that some photographers appreciate, at least under bright light.
During lab tests and my side-by-side field shooting, the WG-50 delivered cleaner images in dimmer conditions, with noticeably less noise at ISO 800 and above. Dynamic range was also slightly superior - important for landscapes and high-contrast scenarios. The H90’s images showed slight softness when pixel peeping but compensated for this with wider zoom reach.
The Screen and Interface - How You See, How You Shoot
A camera’s screen and UI can make or break the shooting experience, especially outside studio environments.

The Sony H90 boasts a larger 3" LCD (461k dots) with ClearPhoto TFT technology, which produces crisp images ideal for framing and reviewing shots. The WG-50’s smaller 2.7" fixed LCD at 230k dots feels noticeably less sharp and bright in sunlight, although Ricoh provides a “live view” that's sufficient for composing.
Neither camera offers a touchscreen or electronic viewfinder, which is forgivable given their pricing and category. The WG-50’s UI is very straightforward, with a logical menu but fewer exposure modes - reflecting its casual, rugged intent. The Sony, on the other hand, offers manual exposure control and white balance bracketing, appealing to enthusiasts wanting a bit more creative flexibility.
Zoom Range and Optics - The Tale of the Lenses
Zoom specs stand out as a crucial dividing line here.
- Ricoh WG-50: 28-140mm equivalent (5x optical zoom), max aperture F3.5-5.5
- Sony H90: 24-384mm equivalent (16x optical zoom), max aperture F3.3-5.9
The Sony’s hefty 16x zoom range is impressive for a compact, making it the ideal camera for wildlife, distant landscapes, and casual telephoto needs. The WG-50’s 5x zoom is more restrained but has the advantage of a wider minimum focus distance - allowing macro shots as close as 1cm, an advantage for details and textures.
Notably, the WG-50 supports digital image stabilization, optimized to reduce blur in handheld macro or video shooting on the move. The Sony uses optical image stabilization, generally more effective and preferred in photography, particularly at longer focal lengths.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed - Capturing the Moment
The autofocus (AF) systems reveal important operational differences important in genres like sports or wildlife.
The Ricoh WG-50 features 9 contrast-detection AF points with face detection; it supports single AF, continuous AF, and tracking AF at up to 8 frames per second burst shooting. Contrast AF is slower and less reliable in low light but the 8fps continuous burst shooting is robust for this sensor class.
The Sony DSC-H90’s AF system is simpler - contrast detection without continuous AF support, limited to single AF and a 1fps shooting rate. This reflects its vintage (2012) design and focus on casual shooting rather than action.
For wildlife or sports photography where quick focus tracking combined with rapid shooting is necessary, the WG-50 is the clear winner.
Built to Endure? Weather Sealing and Durability
One of the WG-50’s unique selling points is its ruggedness. It is waterproof down to 14 meters, dustproof, shockproof from 1.6 meters, and freezeproof to -10°C. This robustness opens up creative possibilities far beyond most compacts, whether underwater macro, desert dust storms, or freezing mountaintops.
By contrast, the Sony H90 is a delicate compact with no environmental sealing - better kept away from moisture or rough conditions.
Versatility in Photography Genres: Strengths and Weaknesses
It’s helpful to frame this comparison across various photography disciplines:
Portrait Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: With 9 AF points and face detection, it locks focus reasonably well on faces. Bokeh quality is average due to small sensor and modest aperture (F3.5-5.5), but macro mode (1cm focus) allows artistic close-ups of details. Skin tone rendition is decent but slightly muted under artificial light.
- Sony H90: Manual exposure allows more control for creative portraits; however, a slower AF and less dynamic face tracking reduce reliability. Slightly wider aperture (F3.3) at the wide end helps, but bokeh remains limited. Colors pop slightly more in good light.
Landscape Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: Solid dynamic range and robust sensor somewhat favor landscapes; ruggedness makes it perfect for off-trail locations. The 28mm wide-angle equivalent frames moderately wide shots but lacks ultra-wide flexibility.
- Sony H90: Better zoom reach but lower dynamic range holds landscape quality back. Lack of weather sealing necessitates caution outdoors.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: Faster continuous shooting (8fps), better tracking autofocus, and ruggedness make it a capable companion for action and wildlife at moderate zooms.
- Sony H90: Limited burst rate and slower AF mean best for casual subjects; however, the 384mm telephoto zoom extends reach advantageously.
Street and Travel Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: Bulkier and sporty; suitable for rough environments but may draw attention in urban scenes. Waterproof makes it low stress in rain.
- Sony H90: Smaller and lighter, slightly more discreet. Longer zoom covers diverse scenes from cityscapes to candid captures.
Macro Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: Macro focus down to 1cm is outstanding, remarkable for underwater or nature close-ups.
- Sony H90: Macro mode works down to 5cm, acceptable but less versatile.
Night and Astro Photography
- Ricoh WG-50: Higher max ISO 6400 and superior noise control allows better handheld low-light and night shooting.
- Sony H90: Max ISO 3200 and less refined sensor struggle in dim conditions.
Video Capabilities
- Ricoh WG-50: Full HD 1080p at 30fps with digital stabilization - usable for casual clips but no external mic input.
- Sony H90: HD 720p max resolution video only, no stabilization or mic input.
Professional Use and Workflow
Both cameras lack RAW support - a limitation for post-processing control. For professionals needing polished output or integration with professional workflows, these cameras serve best as secondary or casual tools, not primary imaging workhorses.
Technical Deep Dive: Ergonomics, Connectivity, and Storage
Ergonomics on both reflect their designs: WG-50’s rubber grips and buttons emphasize handling under adverse conditions, while Sony’s smooth shell maximizes pocketability but offers fewer handling security features.
Wireless connectivity is present on the Ricoh (Wi-Fi), enabling straightforward image transfer and remote control. The Sony has no wireless options, relying solely on USB and memory cards.
Storage is flexible on both via SD cards; the Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo variants, which may appeal to legacy users.
Battery life is similar: Ricoh claims around 300 shots per charge, Sony about 290 - both acceptable but not exceptional.
Real-World Image Gallery: A Side-by-Side Look
Nothing beats sample images to compare actual output.
In-daylight outdoor shots, both deliver satisfying detail. The WG-50’s colors appear slightly more natural and balanced, with less waxy texture typical of CCD sensors seen on the Sony.
Indoor and low light shots reveal the WG-50's advantage in noise control and detail retention. The Sony’s images are softer and noisier.
Macro shots impress with the WG-50’s sharpness and close focus distance.
Final Verdict: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?
Based on extensive side-by-side assessment and practical testing, here are my recommendations:
Choose the Ricoh WG-50 if:
- You need a rugged, waterproof camera ready for outdoor adventures, snorkeling, or challenging environments.
- You want slightly better low light and action photography, including fast burst and decent autofocus.
- Macro photography at extremely close distances is important.
- You value wireless connectivity for quick image sharing.
- Video at Full HD with stabilization is a plus.
- Your budget can stretch a little more for these specialized features (~$280).
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 if:
- You want a more compact and pocketable superzoom camera with an extensive 16x telephoto reach.
- You prioritize manual exposure controls to experiment creatively.
- Your shooting is mostly in good light and casual scenarios where ruggedness is not a concern.
- You are on a tighter budget (~$230) and want optical stability.
- You don’t mind slower autofocus or limited burst for family trips and travel.
Wrapping Up with Experience-Based Recommendations
Having spent countless hours testing cameras in unpredictable real-world conditions, I can affirm that both the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony H90 shine in their respective niches. The WG-50 is a rugged marvel for adventurers who don’t want to baby their equipment. It’s a camera I trust into muddy trails and splash zones, knowing it will perform when you can’t.
The Sony DSC-H90 answers a different call - delivering a versatile zoom range suitable for general-purpose shooting, travel, and casual wildlife-day-outs where portability ranks highest. Its 2012 roots show, but for collectors or light users, it remains relevant.
Ultimately, pros and enthusiasts should weigh your shooting environment and photographic priorities carefully. If environmental resistance and close-range shooting excite you, the WG-50 is worth the incremental investment. If zoom range and exposure control lure you, the Sony may be your camera. Either way, avoid both for professional-grade demands or RAW workflows.
Choosing between two reliable compacts like these boils down to use case and experience. I hope this comprehensive side-by-side comparison, informed by hands-on testing and technical acumen, sheds light on your decision.
Happy shooting - and do remember, the best camera is always the one that feels right in your hands and never lets you miss a moment.
End of Review
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 222 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 290 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $280 | $230 |