Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed August 2009
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony TX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-50 was released 7 years after the TX1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-50 grades vs the TX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony TX1
WG-50 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | August 2009 | More modern by 95 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh WG-50
TX1 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony TX1
WG-50 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 features outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony TX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-50 and the TX1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and TX1.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-50 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $280 | $350 |