Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-6 was launched 5 years later than the WB30F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-6 grades vs the WB30F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Samsung WB30F
WG-6 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 63 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh WG-6
WB30F | WG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung WB30F
WG-6 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-6 enjoys external measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-6 vs the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41635/416358b02d8eb26631d801221d1d2ff921dd675e" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-6 and WB30F is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23331/2333144e4f8283bcac8a720cdd60906b5e569d86" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-6 and WB30F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-6 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-6 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f387a/f387a4f92d675485bfb59bb056c864b3e3878102" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e74a6/e74a64bac59b7f85cf3e9fc26b456ed0ab9038ff" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Samsung WB30F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Flash on, flash off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 246 grams (0.54 lb) | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $271 | $180 |