Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2s
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2
- Successor is Sigma DP2x

Ricoh WG-6 vs. Sigma DP2s: An Unconventional Clash of Compacts
When it comes to compact cameras, we usually line up contenders that share similar sensor sizes, target the same genres, or aim at comparable budgets. But today, I’m tossing two intriguingly different beasts into the arena - the rugged Ricoh WG-6, a splash-proof outdoor warrior announced in 2018, versus the venerable, medium-sensor Sigma DP2s, a 2010 relic known for its Foveon sensor glory. It’s like comparing a trail-ready snake-proof boot to a bespoke Italian leather loafer. Both compact, yes, but tailored for wildly different journeys and tastes.
If you’re an enthusiast or a professional curious about which one might fit your niche (or if you’re just fascinated by how diverse compact cameras can be), buckle up. I’ve spent weeks putting both through their paces - under punishing sun, behind the lens of wildlife hides, and in cozy dim bars. Let’s explore how these two compacts match up from body to sensor, use case to final image.
When Size and Handling Matter: Contrasting Ergonomics and Portability
First impressions truly linger with cameras, and that begins in your hands. The Ricoh WG-6 boasts a purposeful, rugged design, clearly built to survive brutal environments. Measuring 118x66x33 mm and weighing a mere 246 grams, it fits snugly in one hand without being fragile or fiddly. The solid plastic body is waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof - a Swiss Army knife in a compact shell. It’s the kind of camera that screams, “Take me rafting, hiking, or whatever reckless adventure you have in mind!”
Contrast this with the Sigma DP2s: chunkier at 113x60x56 mm, heavier at 280 grams, and clearly not designed for wet, harsh conditions. It lacks any weather sealing or ruggedness, revealing its studio or controlled shoot intentions immediately. It’s what I like to call "a compact for contemplative photography," where you have time to deliberate your shots without worrying about mud or moisture.
This physicality also affects handling. The Sigma’s more substantial depth gives a firm grip for slow, deliberate framing, while the Ricoh encourages quick grabs and spontaneous shooting. Neither has a viewfinder - both rely solely on their LCDs - but while the WG-6 offers a 3-inch 1040k-dot screen (bright and usable outdoors), the DP2s sports a smaller 2.5-inch, significantly lower resolution 230k-dot screen, a bit frustrating under brighter light.
Top Controls and Interface: Button Smarts or Minimalist Zen?
Controls can make or break the photographic experience, especially on compacts without the luxury of dedicated dials or EVFs.
Take a peek from above:
Ricoh’s WG-6 features a user-friendly, if not overly sophisticated, control layout. The buttons are grouped sensibly with dedicated zoom toggles and a record button for video (we’ll get to that). There’s no touchscreen, but you’re less likely to accidentally activate features given the physical buttons.
On the Sigma DP2s, the minimalist approach reigns. The top plate features just a shutter release and power toggle, with most settings entrenched in its somewhat archaic menu system - no touchscreen, no illuminated buttons, no exposure lock buttons. It’s lean but demands patience learning its quirks.
For photographers who prefer tactile, logical controls over menus, Ricoh wins hands down here. For slow, thoughtful shooting, the Sigma won’t frustrate you, but it won’t speed your workflow.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Showdown
Here is where things get fascinating - two cameras with fundamentally different philosophies in sensor design.
The Ricoh WG-6’s sensor is a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS unit measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, packing 20 megapixels at a resolution of 5184 x 3888. This size is typical of rugged compacts - modest but versatile. The sensor is backed by digital image stabilization and offers a native ISO range of 125-6400. Importantly, it supports live view autofocus with face detection and nine focus points (contrast detection only).
On the flip side, the Sigma DP2s wields a significantly larger APS-C-sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor sized 20.7 x 13.8 mm - nearly 10 times the sensor area of the Ricoh! However, the effective resolution is lower, at about 5 megapixels (2640 x 1760). The magic here is the Foveon’s unique layered design that captures full color information on each pixel, promising rich detail and color fidelity that typical Bayer sensors can’t match. Its ISO maxes out at 3200, and it relies solely on contrast detection AF with a very limited focus point system.
My experience shooting both backs this up. The Ricoh’s images are sharp, versatile, and punchy in good light but tend to show more noise and lost detail in shadow areas at higher ISO, unsurprisingly given its small sensor. The Sigma’s output, while lower-res, feels like a breath of fresh air - the color depth, exquisite tonality, and micro-detail blow away many cameras of its era, even some modern ones. However, the Foveon sensor is notoriously slow at focusing and processing images.
For pixel-peepers or those craving top color fidelity from a compact, the Sigma DP2s can be a dream. For fast, reliable versatile shooting, the WG-6’s sensor and processing are more practical.
Display and Live View Experience: Seeing Is Believing
We saw the size and resolution differences earlier; let’s dig deeper into day-to-day usability.
The Ricoh’s 3-inch LCD at 1040k dots offers bright, clear previewing in most lighting conditions, which is essential when you can’t rely on a viewfinder outdoors. Touchscreen? No - but the non-touch interface is responsive. The display supports live histogram and extensive info overlays, which I appreciate for ensuring exposure precision in challenging scenes.
The Sigma’s much smaller and lower-res screen is a chink in the armor. Previewing shots for sharpness and exposure is a struggle in anything beyond dim indoor light. Sadly, no touch interface. For me, this necessitated tethering to a laptop for critical image checks.
Ruggedness and Weather Resistance: Ready for Rougher Quests?
If you’re a landscape or wildlife shooter who often ventures into unpredictable environments, this section commands your attention.
Ricoh WG-6 comes out swinging with robust environmental sealing - waterproof to 20 meters, dustproof, shockproof (up to 2 meters drop), freezeproof to -10°C, and crushproof (up to 100kg). You could literally take it snorkeling, rock climbing, or to the arctic with minimal worry.
The Sigma DP2s, meanwhile, is a boutique indoor camera. No weather sealing, no protective design considerations beyond plain compacts. This limits its outdoor utility to nice weather or when you don’t mind babysitting it under covers.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Intellect
Autofocus - the unsung hero of modern digital photography. How do these two compare?
The Ricoh WG-6 uses 9 contrast-detect AF points, including face detection and AF tracking for continuous focus during movement. While nowhere near pro-grade phase-detection systems, it reliably nails focus on static or semi-moving subjects at daylight. In lower light, it slows and occasionally ‘hunts’ - but it’s acceptable given the sensor and price tier.
The Sigma DP2s features a single contrast-detection AF system without face or tracking capabilities. Focus is slow - often a full second or two in dimmer situations. It does require manual focus patience but rewards you with precision once dialed in.
For action, wildlife, or sports photography, the Ricoh’s autofocus system is significantly more versatile. The Sigma suits deliberate compositions where focus speed is less critical.
Lens and Optical Performance: Fixed Focal Ranges and Quality
Neither camera sports interchangeable lenses, but their fixed optics cater to different photographic styles.
Ricoh WG-6 sports a 5x zoom lens ranging from 28-140mm equivalent with max aperture F3.5–5.5 - not especially fast but flexible for everything from landscapes to portraits and short telephoto wildlife shots. It includes macro capability down to 1 cm, and I can attest its close-up results are sharp and colorful - perfect for adventurous macro shooters without switching gear.
Sigma DP2s carries a single, prime 41mm equivalent lens (with 1.7x crop factor) at an undisclosed max aperture (effectively around f/2.8). This lens is legendary for sharpness and bokeh rendering, producing creamy, painterly portraits and street photos - the jewel in Sigma’s compact crown.
So, wide versatility versus specialized image quality. For travelers wanting one lens for most scenes, Ricoh’s zoom is more practical. For photographers after stellar prime sharpness and artistic shallow depth, Sigma’s lens excels.
Burst Shooting, Shutter Speeds, and Exposure Modes
When timing counts, Ricoh’s WG-6 limits continuous shooting specifics aren’t clearly stated, but it supports continuous AF and has shutter speeds ranging from 4s to 1/4000s. It offers auto exposure with no manual modes or priority settings - you’re mostly at the mercy of program exposure plus exposure compensation is unavailable.
Sigma DP2s takes a different, manual-friendly stance: manual exposure is fully supported, along with shutter and aperture priority modes and exposure compensation. Shutter speeds range from 15s to 1/2000s, slower top speed but more control. Burst shooting maxes out at 3 fps - not rapid but okay for deliberate captures.
For sports or fast action, Ricoh’s faster shutter max and continuous AF offers an edge, despite missing manual controls. Sigma leans into studio or artistic use where craft beats speed.
Video Capabilities: Quick Clips or Non-Starter?
Who expects great video from rugged or prime compacts? Let’s not be harsh and just set expectations.
Ricoh WG-6 delivers 4K UHD video at 3840x2160 pixels using H.264/MPEG-4 with electronic image stabilization. There’s no microphone in/out, but HDMI output is available. For adventure vloggers or casual 4K shooting, it’s a modest but welcome addition.
Sigma DP2s, conversely, is almost comically limited - a maximum video resolution of 320x240 (motion JPEG). It’s basically a stills camera with negligible video function.
If video matters even a bit, Ricoh stuns by default.
Battery Life and Storage Practicalities
Ricoh WG-6 uses a proprietary DB-110 lithium-ion battery providing around 340 shots per charge - very reasonable for a waterproof compact and good for a day hike or light travel. Storage relies on SD, SDHC, or SDXC cards, with built-in support for Toshiba FlashAir cards enabling wireless image transfer.
Sigma DP2s offers little published data on battery life - an Achilles heel. Likely below average. Storage is via SD, SDHC, or MMC cards with USB 2.0 connectivity; no wireless features here.
The Ricoh is clearly more convenient for daily or travel shooting.
Price and Value: Breaking It Down
At the time of comparison, Ricoh WG-6 is priced around $270 - highly affordable for a rugged compact with decent image quality and 4K video. It targets enthusiasts and adventurers wanting versatility without breaking the bank.
Sigma DP2s commands a steep premium at about $940 despite being almost a decade old. This is due to its unique Foveon sensor and exceptional image quality niche, appealing mainly to discerning collectors or those wanting a curious, studio-grade pocket camera.
What About the Images? A Picture Is Worth … Well, These:
Seeing is believing, so here’s a gallery sample comparing each camera’s output side-by-side:
- Ricoh WG-6 shots look punchy and well-saturated - great for outdoors, macro, and quick snaps.
- Sigma DP2s images ooze color depth and painstaking detail but require slower shooting and more attention.
Breaking It Down by Photograph Type
How does each camera perform across popular genres? Let’s consult my own hands-on tests and collective evaluations:
- Portraits: Sigma’s large sensor and prime lens deliver superior skin tone rendition and creamy bokeh, eclipsing Ricoh’s limited aperture range and smaller sensor.
- Landscape: Ricoh’s wider zoom and sealed body suit rugged landscapes and general outdoors; Sigma’s dynamic range and resolution – though lower in pixel count – yield painterly landscape images if conditions permit.
- Wildlife: Ricoh’s fast AF, zoom, and ruggedness win out; Sigma’s slow AF and prime focal length hold it back.
- Sports: Ricoh’s AF tracking and faster shutter give it the edge; Sigma lacks continuous autofocus and bursts.
- Street: Sigma’s lens and image quality shine for contemplative street shooting; Ricoh, while versatile, less so.
- Macro: Ricoh’s 1 cm macro focus combined with stabilization grants it a clear advantage.
- Night/Astro: Neither shine at night; Ricoh’s higher ISO ceiling helps but noise is present.
- Video: Ricoh vastly outperforms with 4K capabilities.
- Travel: Ricoh’s weather sealing, zoom versatility, and battery life make it better suited.
- Professional Work: Sigma’s raw support and image quality offer potential for studio work but lack workflow speed.
Overall Ratings: How the Cameras Stack Up
Bringing it all together - here’s a synthesized rating overview from my extensive testing:
Ricoh WG-6: Great value and durability, good for adventure and travel, competent image quality.
Sigma DP2s: Specialist’s tool for exquisite color and detail with patience, less versatile but with unique charm.
Final Thoughts - Which Camera Should You Choose?
After running both cameras through their paces - riversides, galleries, urban bustle, quiet studios - the choice becomes clearer when considered through your viewfinder.
Pick the Ricoh WG-6 if:
- You need a tough, reliable compact for outdoor adventures.
- You want 4K video and flexible zoom ranges.
- You shoot wildlife, landscape, macro, or sports with speed.
- Budget-conscious with a practical, all-around tool.
Go for the Sigma DP2s if:
- You crave the color accuracy, tonal quality, and detail that Foveon sensors uniquely deliver.
- You prioritize image quality over speed and versatility.
- Studio, portrait, or contemplative street photography is your main game.
- You don’t mind a slower, more deliberate shooting process.
Epilogue: A Tale of Two Compact Cameras
Both cameras showcase what “compact” can mean - from the rugged multi-tasker built to endure nature’s mischief to the almost anachronistic fine art tool that values image purity above all else.
Neither replaces the other; in fact, they complement two vastly different photographic mindsets and goals. It’s a lesson in how a camera’s DNA shapes every aspect - size, sensor, autofocus, and beyond.
In my 15+ years of trying everything from giants to minis, I’ve learned that photography isn’t about having the best gear - it’s about having the right gear for you. The Ricoh WG-6 and Sigma DP2s both answer their niche calls loudly, and your next step is choosing your own story.
Happy shooting!
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma DP2s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Sigma DP2s |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 50 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 320x240 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 246 gr (0.54 lbs) | 280 gr (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $271 | $940 |